Generational Polarization

The world really has changed, and fast. Internet accessibility has allowed the Millennial Generation to be the most well-informed demographic in history, unquestionably. When I was a kid, being smart meant that you knew a lot of facts, interesting and not. With instant access to facts, nobody argues about facts first of all, but there’s a reasonable argument to be said that knowing too many facts might actually be maladaptive.

Anyway, a lot of people who read blogs like this are young. To old people, it’s fantasy. Big ideas, bitcoin, libertarians, all of that. Big picture ideas are things that philosophers muse about, wholly unrealistic and fringe, except that when it actually picks up steam, it’s outright scary. “What the fuck, these young kids actually support this crazy shit? This is insane!” Everything is too radical, and even dangerous, and yet they see young people more and more interested in the “extremes” which confound them. In fact, most of the shit that young people think about are, in fact, ridiculous. Certainly Internet hasn’t decreased the amount of ridiculous conspiracy theories and utter drivel that people will believe; it’s increased crazies of all varieties. Often I talk about political polarization and the echo chamber effect of social media, but this is actually about another kind of polarization: Generational polarization. Older people and younger people are losing connection.

We currently have a massive cultural divide between old and young people. One clear example is the divide in the Democratic Primaries. Bernie Sanders wins 70% of voters under 30 overall, and 82% in Pennsylvania on exit polls. Among older democrats, there is a similar blowout support for Clinton. There is a clear gap, a clear divide even among Democrats (although this is far from a monolithic group). I noted a facebook discussion recently between one of the younger Bernie supporters and an older Clinton supporter. Ignoring the name-calling which has become standard as bitterness escalates, the substance can be seen as “incremental change vs revolutionary change.”

It’s a common divide, historically speaking and usually, I think, the older people are right, all things being equal. There’s always the temptation to believe that you are living at the pinnacle of history (which is true, but is it special?), that your movement, your issues, your generation is more significant, more real compared to the struggles and movements of the past. Young people are more idealistic, sure, but it’s also easier to feel a kind of historical inevitability, having nothing else in their life to compare it to. Those who have a past to look at have the wisdom to see past that perhaps having experienced themselves similar blind enthusiasm first hand, seen movements rise and fall, and understand ideas and movements within a historical context. This usually results in a tempered, milder feeling about these things compared to impassioned youth. In fact, many will see the passion from Sanders supporters and Trump supporters as the same rise of a dangerous destabilizing malcontent to civilized society –opposite sides of the same coin. In short, the argument is that “young people are over-reacting.” Nostradamus predicted the end of the world, as have many others. Luddites have talked about there being no more labor due to machines. We see paintings of “The Scream” in various places and we see these relics as evidence that everyone overestimates and over emphasizes their place in history, and it requires a long view to discern things in context. This is usually right, except, this time, I urge older people to consider the possibility that they might be wrong.

I’m arguing for a kind of historical exceptionalism — that is, that “this time really is different in a fundamental way, and that our generation’s problems are in fact, more significant, and more urgent than at any other point in history, uniquely so.”

I think Tim Urban of Wait but Why, put the idea of escalating timelines nicely: “If you brought somebody who died 100 years ago back to life and showed them life as it is now, they’d be mind-blown.” What about that guy? How long would that guy need to go back in history to find a person’s whose mind would be blown away? It’s reasonable to believe that the guy from 100 years ago has less in common with how we live than a person living 1000 years ago. That is, history is moving faster, exponentially, in how it affects people’s lives. Technology is not incremental; it’s exponential. Look at any graph representing human history by almost any standard: GDP, population, pollution: The curve is not linear. AI and self-learning machines have the potential to change the game in a way that will again, completely overwhelm any human’s limits of imagination, and in an extremely short order of time. Decisions that are made now have so much more absolute impact on everyone than it ever has, and future decisions will have even greater impact.

You wonder why young people are disenchanted with politics? Corruption, sure, but that’s always been a part of politics. Politics moves at a snail’s pace. It’s a long-game struggle of incremental change that fits a slowly changing, slow-moving world, with many redundancies and processes that purposely limit the speed of change–it’s safer that way. To young people though, it’s an out of touch world, out of touch with their experiences, with their language, and the realities that they’ve lived through. There is a strong sense of “what the fuck are you even talking about, you’re not even talking about the world we live in; stop playing games.” To put it simply, the speed at which politics moves is increasingly becoming out of touch with the speed at which the real world moves. There’s always been a lag between society and law/legislature, but as technology moves societies in exponents, the gap is now so far off that young people see politics as a kind of sick game that old people play, for humor.

The result, of course, is that old people gain disproportionate power in politics. Politicians overwhelmingly pander to the interests of old people, who actually vote, which makes the problem worse. Old people are also the ones who invoke the “duty to vote,” and “if you don’t vote, you don’t have the right to complain” type of talk, which I think they solemnly believe. What they don’t understand is just how far from reality their pace of change and their methods of moving forward are, relative to how fast the real world moves, socially, fiscally, morally. Increasingly, and more rapidly, politics is disenfranchising young people who politicians care about less and less (they vote less than old people).  Should the young be involved in politics? Sure, absolutely. Consider this though:

-There’s a self-perpetuating loop between political disenfranchisement of the young, and the behaviors and self-interest of politicians seeking to get elected that further disenfranchises the young.
-The world is in fact moving faster than at any time in history, and this trend will continue.
-Politics (and likely you) are no longer keeping up with the pace of change in the world.

When politics gets old, the country gets old. We don’t want to be like Japan, politically. When I see the images of their cabinet that looks like an old folks home, it makes me cringe. The young generation have become a pseudo-slave class in that society working suicide inducing hours, while in poverty, without opportunity, in a zombie economy, lead by a cringeworthy racist who openly denies Japan’s role in World War II and continues to troll Korea and China, (like, what the fuck world in what year are you living in?) by visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, with the support of politically privileged old people with retarded sums of savings who don’t spend a dime while blaming the economy on the lacking work ethic of the young.

I get it; you don’t share the same language with young/old people, like conservatives often don’t share the same language as liberals. Please though, talk to your sons and daughters; listen to them. Whether you’re young or old, be flexible in your thinking and talk to different people with differing viewpoints, yes, even the ones that use language that doesn’t mesh with you, and even the crazies.


3 thoughts on “Generational Polarization

  1. TRUMP 2016!

    The divide between younger and older voters is based on culture. The world has moved too far left. The left has penetrated all institutions of higher learning and have shaped this idea of global citizens; people are now more concerned with problems in other areas of the world than the issues within their own communities. The notion of equality now tramples upon everyone’s rights in a futile exercise to ensure no one man, woman, trans, or future otherwise is disenfranchised in any potential or imaginative way be offensive. This has created a grievance culture that is now eroding the culture of exceptionalism that the West was built upon.

    The march of progressives today is mostly filled by the new voting bloc of youth votes and someone older and wiser needs to explain to them that their ideas are actually regressive when compared to the freedoms we have today.


    1. There certainly is a cultural difference.

      Even as a “lefty,” hypersensitivity is annoying. A phrase in our national anthem (Canadian here) just got changed from “in all thy son’t command” to “in all of us command.” I mean, lame, right? Oops. just said lame. Look, I get that part.

      Global citizenship is interesting. We are, simply as a matter of fact, becoming more global every day. Put in all the trade tariffs you want, build walls as high as you want, this isn’t going to stop. Trump won’t stop it, neither will Sanders, or any other politician.

      In your view:

      In what way has concern for a larger global problems neglected local problems that are more pressing?
      What part of leftist obsession with equality tramples your rights or freedoms?
      What makes America exceptional?
      How can Trump help with this?


      1. In what way has concern for a larger global problems neglected local problems that are more pressing?

        A global citizen cares more about the world than the problems at home. In short, they are not very good citizens of their own country. Take for example the migration happening in Europe. The refugees coming from Syria are destroying the communities in which they reside because they fail to assimilate. The refugees (mostly Muslim) rape women whom do not cover up; they incite violence in pubs against drinking patrons; and they attack Christians and Jews. And rather than create safe zones in Syria for these refugees to return to, everyone is content with changing their way of life, their culture, and their values, so as to be inclusive to all. There is a a left-minded sickness that compels people to contradict self interest in favor of a moral collective.

        What part of leftist obsession with equality tramples your rights or freedoms?

        The left perceives equality as diversity and inclusivity. For example, All Ivey league institutions and other elite schools have a diversity mandate. There is now an optimum campus ethnic mix and schools receive a grade correlating to student diversity. This creates an admission system predicated on racial equality rather than merit. Asian students are particularly impacted by these diversity quotas. In fact new admission metrics based on SAT scores shows that – for Asian-American students to gain admission, they have to have SAT scores 140 points higher than white students, 270 points higher than Hispanic students, and 450 points higher than African-American students. It is the lefts perception of equality that tramples on rights and freedoms because it prescribes to virtue signaling rather than true virtues embodied by a merit based system.

        An extension of these ideals is prevalent everywhere; think workplace diversity, it used to mean men and women working together but has now progressed and turned into racial and ethnic diversity. It is the left’s perception of equality that will persuade a future employer to hire a less qualified candidate due to the color of their skin.

        What makes America exceptional?

        America was exceptional because its people and leaders dared to believe they were better than all the other countries in the world; they paved the way for aviation for Americans; they created the vaccine for polio for Americans; they walked on the moon for Americans. They accomplished all these things for Americans-first, and not Humanity-first; America’s success story was motivated by competition to beat Russia, and to beat the UK, and all the other nations of the world.

        How can Trump help with this?

        Trump can bring back American exceptionalism. His platform of America-first challenges America to compete in a global market.

        Its time to do away with the red tape of environmental regulations that prevents America from being energy independent.

        Its time to build that southern border wall and stop the influx of illegal immigration and drugs.

        Its time to impose tariffs on our trading partners and balance the trade deficits, and protect domestic manufacturing.

        Its time to lower corporate taxes to stimulate economic growth and close tax deductions and interest carry forward loopholes for the rich.

        Its time to bring education back to the states where students can receive customized and tailor made curriculum that best mirror their regional job market.

        Its time for state lines to be opened and citizens be allowed to choose health insurance plans from any provider regardless of state.

        Its time for America First.

        Trump 2016!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s